A little clarity before we start.

It can be a good fit when a process is important to your business and standard tools cannot support it well. If an existing product can solve the problem, that is worth exploring first. An initial conversation helps establish whether a custom build is a sensible next step.

The cost depends on the workflows, integrations, data migration and support involved. We first clarify the scope and priorities, then discuss a proposal. If you have a budget in mind, share it so we can consider what a useful first release could include.

A focused tool and a full legacy replacement have different needs. We agree milestones after understanding the scope, dependencies and availability of feedback, and discuss a phased release where that makes sense.

Yes. We assess the existing data and business rules, plan the migration and validate the result. Our Torque Fast project replaced a 30-year-old Paradox database with a modern web-based application.

No. Start with what your team is trying to do, what is frustrating today and what you would like to change. Existing spreadsheets and examples of the current process are useful starting points. Avoid sending confidential data in the initial enquiry.

Often, yes. We first check whether each application provides an API, export or another supported integration method. That assessment helps establish what can be automated, which permissions are needed and any third-party costs or limits.

We discuss handover, maintenance and support as part of planning the project. Hosting, monitoring, backups and future improvements can be included in an agreed support arrangement. The specific scope and response expectations are agreed for your application.

Ownership, licensing, source-code access and hosting responsibilities should all be clear before work begins. We cover these in the project agreement, including any third-party services or components, so you can make an informed decision.